One of the most controversial debates in history concerns itself of “the means versus the end.” Before beginning the discussion, let me define what I mean by “means” and “ends.” Means are the methods which one chooses to take to achieve a certain objective. They may include any resources used, a specific way of thinking or acting, and any other forms of help one seeks. Ends are the ultimate purpose that one wishes to reach. In my life as a student, they usually take the form of getting good grades or winning a competition, but they can be any other goal that one desires. So which one is more important? Is achieving the end goal more important than taking the right path towards success? Assuming the extreme positions to make things simpler, is it right to choose questionable methods if it promises success or should one consider the nature of the means before the ends? It seems as though choosing the ethical and moral means regardless of the results is the correct way, ...
As avid adorers of Harry Potter, many spells live in our mind, but among many, the spell "illegibilus" – making writing impossible to be read – prompted us to think: then, what makes something readable? What are the meanings behind everyday encounters and what becomes of our curiosities that are so often not answered? So, we present "Legibilus", a space where scattered thoughts are gathered, unresolved questions are offered new answers, and every object, however miniscule, can be read.